Theorem 3.2.2: Completeness Theorem in R |
Let |
To prove the second, more important statement, we have to prove two parts:
First, assume that the sequence converges to some limit a.
Take any
> 0. There
exists an integer N such that if j > N then
| aj - a | <
/2.
Hence:
| aj - ak |if j, k > N. Thus, the sequence is Cauchy.| aj - a | + | a - ak| < 2
/ 2 =
![]()
Second, assume that the sequence is Cauchy (this direction is much harder). Define the set
S = {xSince the sequence is bounded (by part one of the theorem), say by a constant M, we know that every term in the sequence is bigger than -M. Therefore -M is contained in S. Also, every term of the sequence is smaller than M, so that S is bounded by M. Hence, S is a non-empty, bounded subset of the real numbers, and by the least upper bound property it has a well-defined, unique least upper bound. LetR: x < aj for all j except for finitely many}
a = sup(S)We will now show that this a is indeed the limit of the sequence. Take any
> 0 , and choose
an integer N > 0 such that
| aj - ak | <if j, k > N. In particular, we have:/ 2
| aj - aN + 1 | <if j > N, or equivalently/ 2
-Hence we have:/ 2 < aj - aN + 1 <
/ 2
aj > aN + 1 -for j > N. Thus, aN + 1 -/ 2
/ 2
is in the set S, and we have that
aIt also follows thataN + 1 -
/ 2
aj < aN + 1 <for j > N. Thus, aN + 1 </ 2
/ 2
is not in the set S, and therefore
aBut now, combining the last several line, we have that:aN + 1 <
/ 2
|a - aN + 1 | <and together with the above that results in the following:/ 2
| a - aj | < |a - aN + 1 | + | aN + 1 - aj | < 2for any j > N./ 2 =
![]()