Example 7.4.4(e): Lebesgue Integral for Simple Functions

We have seen before that the representation of a simple function is not unique. Show that the Lebesgue integral of a simple function is independent of its representation.
Context Context
We have to show that if s is a simple function with two different representations, then the integrals using either representation agree.

First assume that there are two representations for s

sA(x) = aj XAj(x) with Aj disjoint and aj not zero
sB(x) = bk XBk(x) with Bk disjoint and bk not zero
such that sA(x) = sB(x). Let's assume that the integral of s using the first representation exists, i.e. the measure of all sets Aj is finite.

If x Bk then x must be contained in one of the Aj's because otherwise sB(x) # 0 and sA(x) = 0. Therefore Bk Aj so that m(Bk) is finite for all k so that sB is integrable.

By the same reasoning we have

Bk = j ( Aj Bk ) and Aj = k ( Bk Aj )
If Aj Bk is not empty, then for x Aj Bk we have
aj = sA(x) = sB(x) = bk
so that aj = bk in that case. Putting everything together gives:
so that the integrals agree regardless of the representation.

It remains to show that the integral of a simple function agrees with the integral over the canonical representation of that function, i.e. when the sets are disjoint and the coefficients are not zero.


Interactive Real Analysis, ver. 1.9.5
(c) 1994-2007, Bert G. Wachsmuth
Page last modified: Mar 28, 2007